Author Topic: Suggestion for update...  (Read 3192 times)

Hatser

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 33
  • Karma: +0/-2
  • Create it by yourself. You're not dumm.
    • View Profile
Suggestion for update...
« on: August 29, 2012, 09:39:57 pm »
It would be great if pawno scripts could be handled in servers (pawno is easier than squirrel to me)

Thijn

  • Tester
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 531
  • Karma: +27/-16
    • View Profile
Re: Suggestion for update...
« Reply #1 on: August 29, 2012, 09:48:01 pm »
You are free to code your own pawn plugin, but it ain't gonna be made by the LU Devs.
Squirrel is much easier to learn then pawn (not pawno, thats the editor not the language) so get over it, or make your own module :)

Hatser

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 33
  • Karma: +0/-2
  • Create it by yourself. You're not dumm.
    • View Profile
Re: Suggestion for update...
« Reply #2 on: August 29, 2012, 10:31:53 pm »
I'll get over it.

Nexus

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 45
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Suggestion for update...
« Reply #3 on: August 30, 2012, 12:18:15 am »
pawn sux, i think that's the worst thing SAMP has :P



<X_94> messi suckz!!
<~Baldachyn> yes x94 finally some sane words from you

Rocky

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 105
  • Karma: +5/-3
    • View Profile
Re: Suggestion for update...
« Reply #4 on: August 30, 2012, 06:19:45 am »
pawn doesn't suck, squirrel is just better.
Look for lu server testers, Requirements are:
English good enough to communicate.
Good knowledge about gaming.

PM me those who are interested.

SugarD

  • Argonath RPG Dev/Manager
  • Tester
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 820
  • Karma: +37/-75
  • STOP IN THE NAME OF THE COLESLAW!
    • View Profile
    • Clan Xperience
Re: Suggestion for update...
« Reply #5 on: August 31, 2012, 11:52:02 pm »
pawn doesn't suck, squirrel is just better.
Lol I love the way you worded that. xD

Thijn

  • Tester
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 531
  • Karma: +27/-16
    • View Profile
Re: Suggestion for update...
« Reply #6 on: September 01, 2012, 03:05:09 pm »
pawn doesn't suck, squirrel is just better.
Lol I love the way you worded that. xD
That's indeed a very nice way to say it :P

Vortrex

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 267
  • Karma: +54/-73
    • View Profile
Re: Suggestion for update...
« Reply #7 on: September 05, 2012, 10:36:56 pm »
They both have their ups and downs, even though Squirrel has more advantages and less disadvantages than Pawn does.

I've noticed that Squirrel executes faster than Pawn, although this was tested from the LU server executable versus the SA-MP server executable.

One major disadvantage that I don't like against Pawn in the whole Squirrel/Pawn comparison is the array capabilities in Pawn. They really suck ... badly. Squirrel arrays can be anything from a function to a string or integer or even another array. Also, Squirrel arrays can be multidimensional, as Pawn is limited to 2 or 3 dimensions or something like that. I also hate that public functions can't return strings in Pawn.

The only upside of Pawn versus Squirrel in this case (besides the precompiling and "closed source" capabilities, which is available in Squirrel too, I think) is the amount of scripts made for it, even though this isn't really due to it "being Pawn", but more or less because the amount of support from the SA-MP community.

 

© Liberty Unleashed Team.